Europeanization of CEE executives : EU member shift negotiations as a shapping power
By: LIPPERT, Barbara
.
Contributor(s): UMBACH, Gaby | WESSEL, Wolfgang].
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: December 2001Subject(s): Negociação | EU Membership | Europeanizaton | Public Administration | Transformation | Central and Eastern EuropeJournal of European Public Policy 8, 6, p. 980-102Abstract: This article examines the impact of European integration on the central executives, i.e. the central government and the ministerial bureaucracy, of the Czech Republic, Estonia , Hungary, Poland and Slovenia (CEEC-5) by distinguish five stages of "Europeanization".The EU pressures candidates to reform their national adminstrations in anticipation of membership. These "EU"pressures are not uniform, but involve different "mechanisms of Europeanization and modes of governance.National reactions and solutions do not converge, no leaste because there is no single model of national daminitraio for EU itfsef .Moreover, the EU dos not oferr a precise administrative targuet zone for hte adptation process. In the current membership negotiations, the central executives of the CEEC-5 play a dominats roel.This could reinforce a trend towards the strenghening of officials at the expensive of other political actors in the EU policy cycle after acession. Anticipared EU membership is a driveing force for administrative reform, but the candidate cotries still need medium-term strategies for developing inte efficient multi-level players in the European policy-making process
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
This article examines the impact of European integration on the central executives, i.e. the central government and the ministerial bureaucracy, of the Czech Republic, Estonia , Hungary, Poland and Slovenia (CEEC-5) by distinguish five stages of "Europeanization".The EU pressures candidates to reform their national adminstrations in anticipation of membership. These "EU"pressures are not uniform, but involve different "mechanisms of Europeanization and modes of governance.National reactions and solutions do not converge, no leaste because there is no single model of national daminitraio for EU itfsef .Moreover, the EU dos not oferr a precise administrative targuet zone for hte adptation process. In the current membership negotiations, the central executives of the CEEC-5 play a dominats roel.This could reinforce a trend towards the strenghening of officials at the expensive of other political actors in the EU policy cycle after acession. Anticipared EU membership is a driveing force for administrative reform, but the candidate cotries still need medium-term strategies for developing inte efficient multi-level players in the European policy-making process
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.